Skip to main content

C++14 - Tuple addressing via type

Today I would like to introduce one of new features which will arrive to C++ with new language standard (C++14) which is going to be release in 2014. In order to compile example from this article you need to have compiler supporting C++14 standard. The newest version of GCC supports it.

I would like to introduce you features called Tuple addressing via type which allows us to get tuple element value using type name instead of tuple parameter number. Of course it is possible only for type names which are not ambiguous. Let's take a look on below example for better understanding:
In point I we are declaring our tuple type containng of 2 int elements and on string element.

In point II we are using std::get function to get values of our tuple typed variable using tuple parameters numbers. This feature is well known from C++11 standard.

Point III shows new (introduced in C++14 standard) way of getting values of tuple elements. We are getting string type element using type name instead of putting parameter number. This can be more comfortable. Of course it is not possible to get int paramters values that way, because we have more than one int parameters in our tuple so tryting to get int element via type name is ambiguous. It is snown in commented code of point IV. If you uncomment this code and will try to compile example, you will receive compilation error.

 Code of this example can find on our GitHub account here: https://github.com/xmementoit/CppAdventureExamples/tree/master/cpp14/tupleAddressingViaType

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blog's new layout

As you noticed this blog has new layout from today. I hope you like it. I think new layout looks better and more modern than previous one. Please, write you opinion about new layout in comments. If you have some ideas how to make this blog better, all ideas are welcomed. Enjoy new layout and blog articles.

QT - foreach algoriithm with const references performance improvement

Today I would like to show you optimal way of using foreach QT algorithm . I will show you why we should pass elements of foreach algorithm by const reference instead of passing them by value. Let me explain it on the below example: Output of this example is: In point I we are creating 3 objects of MyClass class and push them to myClasses QList element. In point II we are using QT foreach algorithm to invoke getValue() method for each object from myClasses list. As you can see on output text for that part of code we are invoking copy constructor before and destructor after invoking getValue() function. It is because we are passing each myClasses list element to foreach algorithm by value. Therefore we are copying that element at the beginning of foreach loop step and removing them (destructing) at the end. This is inefficient solution, especially when class of object being copied is big. It decreases performance. of our application. Solution for that i...

Advanced C++ - Compiler generated functions

When we define some class in our C++ code, compiler is generating some important functions for our class (unless we define it explicitly). Those functions (sometimes called Compiled Generated Functions ) are:  default constructor   destructor   copy constructor   copy assignment operator  During compilation, compiler knows our code and classes usage, so when we are using one of above functions implicitly, it generate that function implicitly for us in the class body. For better explenation, let's see the example below: In point (I) we are defining class TestClass . This class seems to be empty. However we are implicitly using following function in main class:  point III - we are implicitly using defualt constructor in order to create instance of TestClass - default constructor of TestClass is implicitly generated by compiler   point IV - we are using copy constructor of TestClass in order to copy instance to...