Skip to main content

QT - foreach algoriithm with const references performance improvement

Today I would like to show you optimal way of using foreach QT algorithm. I will show you why we should pass elements of foreach algorithm by const reference instead of passing them by value.

Let me explain it on the below example:
Output of this example is:
In point I we are creating 3 objects of MyClass class and push them to myClasses QList element.

In point II we are using QT foreach algorithm to invoke getValue() method for each object from myClasses list. As you can see on output text for that part of code we are invoking copy constructor before and destructor after invoking getValue() function. It is because we are passing each myClasses list element to foreach algorithm by value. Therefore we are copying that element at the beginning of foreach loop step and removing them (destructing) at the end. This is inefficient solution, especially when class of object being copied is big. It decreases performance. of our application.

Solution for that inefficiency is passing elements to foreach QT algorithm by const reference, as shown on point III. Thanks to that we are doing our operations on existing objects from myClasses list without copying. As you can see on the output text we are not invoking constructor and destructor foreach element here, so performance is better.

Code of this example you can find on our GitHub account here: https://github.com/xmementoit/CppAdventureExamples/tree/master/qt/foreachRefCount
Labels:

Comments

  1. qtgeek19 January 2014 at 18:39

    Good explanation. Good to know this advantage of const references in QT foreach algorithm.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog's new layout

As you noticed this blog has new layout from today. I hope you like it. I think new layout looks better and more modern than previous one. Please, write you opinion about new layout in comments. If you have some ideas how to make this blog better, all ideas are welcomed. Enjoy new layout and blog articles.
3 comments
Read more

STL - count and count_if algorithms

One of the basic and most useful STL algorithms is algorithm which can be used to count number of elements within selected container according to specified criteria. In order to do that we can use std::count or std::count_if algorithm. std::count (firstElementIterator, lastElementIterator, elementForSearch) - is function which will go through container using firstElementIterator and lastElementIterator and return number of container elements which value is equal elementForSearch std::count_if (firstElementIterator, lastElementIterator, UnaryPredicateFunction) - is function which examine range from firstElementIterator to lastElementIterator and return number of container elements which fulfill UnaryPredicateFunction criteria. UnaryPredicateFunction is function having following signature: bool functionName(const Type& a) . So, count_if returns number of elements where UnaryPredicateFunction returns true for. For better understanding let's take a...
Post a Comment
Read more

C++ Multithreading - Race conditions

In the previous C++ Multithreading article I presented you how to pass parameters between threads. Take a detail look on the output of that example once again: In the first line of that output you can notice that output text from two threads is mixed. You are probably wondering why it happens? It is because we are not protecting resources which are shared by two threads (in this example cout stream is shared in both threads) which causes multithreading's phenomenon called race condition . Because threads switching and accessing to shared resources are managed by operating system we do not know when std::cout stream will be accessed by main thread and when it will be accessed by second thread. Therefore in the previous article I mentioned that output of the example can be little different on your computer than my output example. What's more it is possible that this output will be different for few consecutive invoking of the example on the same machine. It is beca...
Post a Comment
Read more